Online gambling: A treatment for sports betting addiction
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24265/liberabit.2020.v26n2.04Keywords:
online gambling, gambling disorder, treatment, gambling addiction, youth, ethical gamblingAbstract
Background: online gambling (bets, casino games, poker, etc.) is an activity that is spreading worldwide, even in countries where it is not yet legalized. Although the situation in Latin America is very heterogeneous, it is possible that, as online gambling is developed and promoted, addiction problems arise. This has already happened in Spain since the legalization of online gambling in 2011. Thus, psychology should be developing intervention programs to face this new scenario. Goal: this paper describes the treatment protocol for a young man with sports betting addiction. Method: the treatment proposal consisted in a cognitive behavioral therapy which focused on deconditioning of gambling situations; training of skills needed to prevent relapses and overcome risky situations; information on gambling risks; change of attitude towards gambling; and promotion of a healthy lifestyle incompatible with gambling addiction. Results: both the treatment phases and the theoretical basis of the intervention proposal are described. The patient, diagnosed with a severe gambling disorder, showed improvements in the gambling disorder criteria and the Symptom Severity Scale Score. Conclusions: a treatment protocol for online gambling addiction, which is based on the principles of motivation and learning, has been developed. This protocol has demonstrated to be effective in reducing gambling behavior and promoting a new healthy lifestyle.
Downloads
References
American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (DSM-5). American Psychiatric Pub.
Ashrafioun, L., McCarthy, A., & Rosenberg, H. (2012). Assessing the impact of cue exposure on craving to gamble in university students. Journal of Gambling Studies, 28(3), 363-375. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10899- 011-9262-0
Barlow, D. H., & Hersen, M. (1998). Diseños experimentales de caso único. Martínez Roca.
Chóliz, M. (2018). Ethical Gambling: A Necessary New Point of View of Gambling in Public Health Policies. Frontiers in Public Health, 6, 12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2 018.00012
Chóliz, M., & Marcos, M. (2018). Cuando jugar es un problema. Psylicom Ediciones.
Chóliz, M., & Marcos, M. (2020). Tratamiento psicológico de la adicción al juego online. Ediciones Pirámide.
Chóliz, M., Marcos, M., & Lázaro-Mateo, J. (2019). The Risk of Online Gambling. A Study of Gambling Disorder Prevalence Rates in Spain. International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction, 11(4). https://doi.org/ 10.1007/s11469-019-00067-4
Derogatis, L. R., & Cleary, P. A. (1977). Confirmation of the Dimensional Structure of the SCL-90: A study in construct validation. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 33(4), 981-989. https://doi.org/10.1002/1097- 4679(197710)33:4<981::AID JCLP2270330412>3.0.CO;2-0
Echeburúa, E., Báez, C., & Fernández-Montalvo, J. (1996). Comparative Effectiveness of Three Therapeutic Modalities in the Psychological Treatment of Pathological Gambling: Long-Term Outcome. Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy, 24(1), 51- 72. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1352465800016830
Gerstein, D., Hoffmann, J., Larison, C., Engelman, L., Murphy, S., Palmer, A., Chuchro, L., Toce, M., Johnson, R., Bluie, T., & Hill, M. A. (1999). Gambling impact and behavior study. Report to the National Gambling Impact Study Commission. National Opinion ResearchCenter at the University of Chicago.
Goudriaan, A., Oosterlaan, J., de Beurs, E., & Van den Brink, W. (2004). Pathological Gambling: A Comprehensive Review of Biobehavioral Findings. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 28(2), 123-141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2004.03.001
Griffiths, M. (2003). Internet Gambling: Issues, Concerns, and Recommendations. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 6(6), 557-568. https://doi.org/10.1089/109493103322725333
Griffiths, M., & Barnes, A. (2008). Internet Gambling: An Online Empirical Study Among Student Gamblers. International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction, 6(2), 194-204. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11469-007-9083-7
Marks, I. (1990). Behavioural (non-chemical) addictions. British journal of addiction, 85(11), 1389-1394. https: //doi.org/10.1111/j.1360-0443.1990.tb01618.x
McBride, J., & Derevensky, J. (2012). Internet Gambling and Risk-Taking Among Students: An Exploratory Study. Journal of Behavioral Addiction, 1(2), 50-58. https://doi.org/10.1556/jba.1.2012.2.2
Miller, W., & Rollnick, S. (1991). La entrevista motivacional. Preparar para el cambio de conductas adictivas. Ediciones Paidós Ibérica, S. A.
Montero, I., & León, O. G. (2005). Sistema de clasificación del método en los informes de investigación en Psicología. International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology, 5(1), 115-127.
O’Donohue, W. T., & Fisher, J. E. (eds.). (2012). Cognitive Behavior Therapy: Core Principles for Practice. John Wiley & Sons.
Organización Mundial de la Salud - OMS. (1977).Clasificación Internacional de las Enfermedades (9.a ed.). https://www.mscbs.gob.es/estadEstudios/estadisticas/docs/CIE9MC_2014_def_accesible.pdf
Organización Mundial de la Salud - OMS. (2018a). CIE11. Clasificación Internacional de las Enfermedades 11.arevisión. https://icd.who.int/es
Organización Mundial de la Salud - OMS. (2018b). ICD11. International Classification of Diseases 11th revision. https://icd.who.int
Petry, N. M., Ammerman, Y., Bohl, J., Doersch, A., Gay, H.,Kadden, R., Molina, C., & Steinberg, K. (2006). Cognitive-behavioral therapy for pathologicalgamblers. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 74(3), 555-567. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.74.3.555
Pierce, W. D., & Cheney, C. D. (2013). Behavior Analysis and Learning (5th ed.). Psychology Press. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203441817
Prochaska, J. O., DiClemente, C. C., & Norcross, J. C. (1992). In Search of How People Change: Applications to Addictive Behaviors. American Psychologist, 47(9), 1102-1114. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.47.9.1102
Riley, B. J. (2015). The Role of Homework in Exposure-Based CBT Outcome for Problem Gambling. International Gambling Studies, 15(3), 394-407. https://doi.org/ 10.1080/14459795.2015.1062532
Riley, B., Baigent, M. F., Harris, S., Larsen, A., Nye, T., & Battersby, M. W. (2018). Extinction of Gambling CueReactivity: A Pilot Study in a Problem Gambling Treatment Setting. http://doi.org/10.33582/2637-4528/ 1010
Riley, B., Smith, D., & Oakes, J. (2011). Exposure Therapy for Problem Gambling in Rural Communities: A Program Model and Early Outcomes. Australian Journal of Rural Health, 19(3), 142-146. https://doi.org/10.1111/ j.1440-1584.2011.01199.x
Schüll, N. D. (2014). Addiction by Design: Machine Gambling in Las Vegas. Princeton University Press.
Smith, D. P., Battersby, M. W., Harvey, P. W., Pols, R. G., & Ladouceur, R. (2013). Two-Group Randomised, Parallel Trial of Cognitive and Exposure Therapies for Problem Gambling: A Research Protocol. BMJ Open, 3(6). http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2013-003244
Sylvain, C., Ladouceur, R., & Boisvert, J. (1997). Cognitive and Behavioral Treatment of Pathological Gambling: A Controlled Study. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 65(5), 727-732. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/ 0022-006X.65.5.727
Tolchard, B., & Battersby, M. W. (2013). Cognitive Behaviour Therapy for Problem Gamblers: A Clinical Outcomes Evaluation. Behaviour Change, 30(1), 12-23. https://doi.org/10.1017/bec.2013.2
Williams, R. J., & Wood, R. T. (2004). The Proportion of Gaming Revenue Derived from Problem Gamblers: Examining the Issues in a Canadian Context. Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy, 4(1), 33-45. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1530-2415.2004.00033.x
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright: In the event that the manuscript is approved for future publication, the authors retain the copyright and assign to the journal the rights to publish, edit, reproduce, distribute, exhibit, and communicate nationally and internationally in the various databases, repositories and portals.
Self-archiving policy: The author can share, disseminate, and publicize his research published by the media (e.g., academic social networks, repositories, and portals) available on the web. During the editorial review process, the journal will provide the author with the previous versions (post-print) which should NOT be disclosed by any media, only for personal use and for final approval. Liberabit will send the author the final version of the article (published version) in PDF and HTML to be shared, disseminated and disclosed by the media available on the web. After the publication of the articles, the authors can make other independent or additional agreements for the non-exclusive dissemination of the version of the article published in this journal (publication in books or institutional repositories), provided that it is indicated with the respective reference that the work has been published for the first time in this journal.