Mechanical reasoning, working memory and processing speed
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24265/liberabit.2019.v25n1.06Keywords:
mechanical reasoning, working memory, short-term memory, processing speedAbstract
Background: Mechanical reasoning (MR) is the ability to identify the components of a system and understand how they interact in order for the system to work. Different mechanical systems, such as those of wheels and gears, require different types of reasoning. Objective: This study seeks to analyze the relationship that working memory (WM) and processing speed (PS) have with MR. Method: One hundred seventy-three (173) university students were assessed through the DAT test which consisted of 30 MR problems, the symbol search subtest of the WAIS-III battery for assessing the PS, and the BIMET-V and BIMET-VE batteries to evaluate the WM verbal and visuospatial components. Results: Regression analyses showed that the proposed variables do not predict the performance in gear problems, while the visuospatial WM and the PS predict the performance in wheel problems. Discussion: The results suggest that gear problems have a low executive demand as they can be solved in a fractional way, while wheel problems require to hold in memory all the components that are part of the system and, at the same time, require a higher attentional load.
Downloads
References
Ackerman, P. L. (2014). Nonsense, common sense, and science of expert performance: Talent and individual differences. Intelligence, 45, 6-17. doi: 10.1016/j.intell.2013.04.009
Andersen, L. (2014). Visual-Spatial Ability: Important in STEM, Ignored in Gifted Education. Roeper Review, 36(2), 114-121. doi: 10.1080/02783193.2014.884198
Arribas, D., Santamaría, P., Sánchez-Sánchez, F., & Fernández-Pinto, I. (2013). Batería para la evaluación de las aptitudes, BAT. Madrid, ES: TEA Editores.
Baddeley, A. D. (2010). Working memory. Current Biology, 20(4), 136-140. doi: 10.1016/ j.cub.2009.12.014
Baddeley, A. D. (2018). Exploring Working Memory: Selected Works of Alan Baddeley. Abingdon, UK: Routledge.
Baddeley, A. D., & Hitch, G. J. (1974). Working memory. In G. H. Bower (Ed.), The Psychology of Learning and Motivation: Advances in Research and Theory (Vol. 8, pp. 47-90). New York, NY: Academic Press.
Barreyro, J. P., Injoque-Ricle, I., Formoso, J., & Burin, D. (2019). Computerized Working Memory Battery (BIMeT-V): Studying the Relation between Working Memory, Verbal Reasoning and Reading Comprehension. Trends in Psychology. 27(I), 53-67. doi: 10.9788\tp2019.1-05
Bennett, G. K., Seashore, H. G., & Wesman, A. G. (1992). Tests de Aptitudes Diferenciales. Buenos Aires: Paidós.
Conway, A. R. A., Cowan, N., Bunting, M. F., Therriault, D. J., & Minkoff, S. R. B. (2002). A latent variable analysis of working memory capacity, short-term memory capacity, processing speed, and general fluid intelligence. Intelligence, 30(2), 163-183. doi: 10.1016/S0160-2896(01)00096-4
Corsi, P. M. (1972). Human memory and the medial temporal region of the brain. Montreal: McGill University Press.
Demetriou, A., Spanoudis, G., Shayer, M., Ven, S. van der, Brydges, C. R., Kroesbergen, E., ... & Swanson, H. L. (2014). Relations between speed, working memory, and intelligence from preschool to adulthood: Structural equation modeling of 14 studies. Intelligence, 46, 107-121. doi: 10.1016/ j.intell.2014.05.013
Engelhardt, L. E., Mann, F. D., Briley, D. A., Church, J. A., Harden, K. P., & Tucker-Drob, E. M. (2016). Strong genetic overlap between executive functions and intelligence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 145(9), 1141-1159. doi: 10.1037/xge0000195
English, L. D. (2016). STEM education K-12: perspectives on integration. International Journal of STEM Education, 3(1), 3. doi: 10.1186/s40594-016-0036-1
Formoso, J., Jacubovich, S., Injoque-Ricle, I., & Barreyro, J. P. (2018). Resolution of arithmetic problems, processing speed and working memory in children. Trends in Psichology, 26(3), 1249-1266. doi: 10.9788/TP2018.3-05en
Fry, A. F., & Hale, S. (2000). Relationships among processing speed, working memory, and fluid intelligence in children. Biological psychology, 54(1- 3), 1-34. doi: 10.1016/S0301-0511(00)00051-X
Hegarty, M. (2004). Mechanical reasoning by mental simulation. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8(6), 280- 285. doi: 10.1016/s1364-6613(04)00100-7
Hegarty, M. (2010). Components of Spatial Intelligence. In B. H. Ross (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 52, pp. 265–297). San Diego, CA: Academic Press. doi: 10.1016/S0079-7421(10) 52007-3
Hegarty, M., & Kozhevnikov, M. (1999). Spatial abilities, working memory and mechanical reasoning. In J. S. Gero & B. Tversky (Eds.), Visual and spatial reasoning in design, Sydney, AU: Key Center for Design Computing and Cognition, University of Sydney.
Hegarty, M., & Sims, V. K. (1994). Individual differences in mental animation during mechanical reasoning. Memory & Cognition, 22(4), 411-430. doi: 10.3758/bf03200867
Hegarty, M., & Steinhoff, K. (1997). Individual differences in use of diagrams as external memory in mechanical reasoning. Learning and Individual Differences, 9(1), 19-42. doi: 10.1016/s1041- 6080(97)90018-2
Hegarty, M., & Tarampi, M. R. (2015). Teaching Spatial Thinking: Perspectives from Cognitive Psychology.Teaching Spatial Thinking from Interdisciplinary Perspectives, New México. Recuperado de http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-1557/paper8.pdf
Injoque-Ricle, I., Barreyro, J. P., Formoso, J., & Burin, D. (2018). Working memory, processing speed and general intelligence: Possible models of relations with visuospatial working memory using the visuospatial Computerized Working Memory Battery (BIMeT-VE). Trends in Psychology, 26(1), 413-427. doi: 10.9788/tp2018.1-16
Jensen, A. R. (2006). Clocking the mind: Mental chronometer individual differences. Oxford, UK: Elsevier.
Kelley, T. R., & Knowles, J. G. (2016). A conceptual framework for integrated STEM education. International Journal of STEM Education, 3(1), 11. doi: 10.1186/s40594-016-0046-z
Liu, A. S., & Schunn, C. D. (2017). Applying math onto mechanisms: Mechanistic knowledge is associated with the use of formal mathematical strategies. Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications, 2(1), 6. doi: 10.1186/s41235-016-0044-1
Mella, N., Fagot, D., Lecerf, T., & Ribaupierre, A. de (2015). Working memory and intraindividual variability in processing speed: A lifespan developmental and individual-differences study. Memory & cognition, 43(3), 340-356. doi: 10.3758/ s13421-014-0491-1
Rouse, W. B., & Morris, N. M. (1986). On looking into the black box: Prospects and limits in the search for mental models. Psychological bulletin, 100(3), 349- 363. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.100.3.349
Sheppard, L. D., & Vernon, P. A. (2008). Intelligence and speed of information-processing: A review of 50 years of research. Personality and Individual Differences, 44(3), 535-551. doi: 10.1016/ j.paid.2007.09.015
Stieff, M., & Uttal, D. H. (2015). How Much Can Spatial Training Improve STEM Achievement? Educational Psychology Review, 27(4), 607-615. doi: 10.1007/s10648-015-9304-8
Wai, J., & Kell, H. J. (2017). What Innovations Have We Already Lost?: The Importance of Identifying and Developing Spatial Talent. In M. Khine (Eds), Visual- spatial Ability in STEM Education (pp. 109-124). Springer, Cham. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-44385-0_6
Wechsler, D. (2003). WAIS III: Test de Inteligencia para Adultos. Buenos Aires, AR: Paidós.
Williams, M. D., Hollan, J. D., & Stevens, A. L. (1983). Human reasoning about a simple physical system. Mental models. In D, Gentner & A. L., Stevens (Eds), Mental models (pp. 131-154). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright: In the event that the manuscript is approved for future publication, the authors retain the copyright and assign to the journal the rights to publish, edit, reproduce, distribute, exhibit, and communicate nationally and internationally in the various databases, repositories and portals.
Self-archiving policy: The author can share, disseminate, and publicize his research published by the media (e.g., academic social networks, repositories, and portals) available on the web. During the editorial review process, the journal will provide the author with the previous versions (post-print) which should NOT be disclosed by any media, only for personal use and for final approval. Liberabit will send the author the final version of the article (published version) in PDF and HTML to be shared, disseminated and disclosed by the media available on the web. After the publication of the articles, the authors can make other independent or additional agreements for the non-exclusive dissemination of the version of the article published in this journal (publication in books or institutional repositories), provided that it is indicated with the respective reference that the work has been published for the first time in this journal.
How to Cite
