Stereotypes and valuations of Peruvian social groups in a sample of wealthy people from Lima
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24265/liberabit.2019.v25n2.03Keywords:
stereotypes, prejudice, intergroup relation, mixedmethod designAbstract
Background: Peruvian society is characterized by its ethnical, cultural and socioeconomic diversity, which leads to complex intergroup relations. Objective: To contribute to understanding this phenomenon, the present study aims to examine the stereotypical representations and prejudice towards different Peruvian social groups by high-socioeconomic-status group members from Lima. Method: The research used a mixed-method design for complementing two different approaches: a quantitative one, where questionnaires were administered to a sample of 90 participants; and a qualitative one, in which semi-structured interviews were conducted with 10 participants. Results: The results showed that the participants identified high- and low-status groups in the Peruvian society, and hold ambivalent stereotypical representations towards them. The participants identified and valued White Peruvians as high-status group members, who are competent and developed but also corrupt. On the other hand, they identified and valued Amazonian and African Peruvians to a lesser extent, who are considered as low-status, undeveloped but joyful groups. Conclusion: The study emphasizes the importance of social class attributes used in the formation of stereotypical representations and prejudice towards different Peruvian social groups.
Downloads
References
Allport, G. (1954). The nature of prejudice. Boston, MA: Addison-Wesley.
APEIM (2010). Fórmula APEIM - NSE LIMA 2010. Retrieved from http://www.apeim.com.pe/niveles.html
Avilés, M. (2016). De dónde venimos los cholos. Lima: Seix Barral.
Bodenhausen, G. V., Mussweiler, T., Gabriel, S. & Moreno, K. N. (2001). Affective Influences on Stereotyping and Intergroup Relations. In J. P. Forgas (Ed.), Handbook of Affect and Social Cognition. Manhaw, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Bruce, J. (2007). Nos habíamos choleado tanto. Psicoanálisis y racismo. Lima: Fondo Editorial de la Universidad San Martín de Porres.
Camino, L., da Silva, P., Machado, A. & Pereira, C. (2001). A face oculta do racismo no Brasil: Uma Análise Psicossociológica. Revista de Psicologia Política, 1, 13-36.
Cambon, L., Yzerbyt, V. & Yakimova, S. (2015). Compensation intergroup relations: An investigation of its structural and strategic foundations. British Journal of Social Psychology, 54, 140-158.
Cosamalón, A. L. (1993). El lado oculto de lo cholo. Allpanchis, 4, 211-226.
Creswell, J.W. (2003). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. 2nd edn. California: Sage Publications.
Cueto, R. M. (2017). Estudios sobre relaciones intergrupales, identidades colectivas e ideología política en dos regiones del Perú (unpublished doctoral dissertation). Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú, Lima, Perú. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12404/9201
Cuddy, A., Fiske, S., & Glick, P. (2007). Warmth and competence as universal dimensions of social perception: The stereotype content model and the BIAS map. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 40, 61-149.
Dovidio, J. F., Pearson, A. R., & Penner, L. A. (2018). Aversive Racism, Implicit Bias, and Microaggressions. Microaggression Theory, 16-31. doi:10.1002/9781119466642.ch2
Durante, F., Tablante, C. B., & Fiske, S. T. (2017). Poo but warm, rich but cold (and competent): Social classes in the stereotype content model. Journal of Social Issues, 73(1), 138-157.
Espinosa, A. (2003). Identidad social e identidad nacional en una muestra de triciclistas en Juliaca (Unpublished undergraduate degree thesis). Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú, Lima, Peru.
Espinosa, A. (2011). Estudios sobre identidad nacional en el Perú y sus correlatos psicológicos, sociales y culturales (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Universidad del País Vasco, San Sebastían, Spain.
Espinosa, A., Calderón-Prada, A., Burga, G., & Güímac, J. (2007). Estereotipos, prejuicios y exclusión social en un país multiétnico: el caso peruano. Revista de Psicología, 15(2), 296-331.
Espinosa, A., & Cueto, R. M. (2014). Estereotipos raciales, racismo y discriminación en América Latina, in E. Zubieta; J. Valencia & G. Delfino (Eds). Psicología Social y Política: procesos teóricos y estudios aplicados. (pp. 431-442). Buenos Aires: EUDEBA.
Fein, S., & Spencer, S. J. (1997). Prejudice as self-image maintenance: Affirming the self through derogating others. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 31-44.
Fiske, S. T. (1998). Stereotyping, prejudice, and discrimination. In D. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (pp. 357–411). New York: McGraw-Hill.
Fiske, S. T. (2000). Stereotyping, prejudice, and discrimination at the seam between the centuries: evolution, culture, mind, and brain. European Journal of Social Psychology, 30, 188-211.
Fiske, S. T. (2015). Intergroup biases: A focus on stereotype content. Current opinion in behavioral sciences, 3, 45-50.
Fiske, S. T., Cuddy, A., Glick, P. & Xu, J. (2002). A model of (often mixed) stereotype content: competence and warmth respectively follow from perceived status and competition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 878-902.
Fiske, S. T. & Taylor, S. (2007). Social Cognition: From Brains to Culture. New York: McGraw- Hill.
Gaertner, S. L. & Dovidio, J. F. (1986). The aversive form of racism. In J. F. Dovidio & S. L. Gaertner (Eds.), Prejudice, discrimination and racism (pp. 61-90). San Diego: Academic Press.
Genna, K. & Espinosa, A. (2012). Identidad, Etnicidad y Bienestar Social en un contexto socialmente excluyente. Psicología & Sociedade, 24(1), 84-93.
Gómez, A. (2005). Los inmigrantes chinos en el Perú. Retrieved from: http://historiaperuana.blogspot.com/2005/12/los-inmigrantes-chinos-en-el-per.html
Hamilton, D. L. (1981). Cognitive Processes in Stereotyping and Intergroup Behavior. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Hernández Sampieri, R., Fernández Collado, C., & Baptista Lucio, P. (2010). Metodología de la investigación. México DF: McGraw-Hill
Heyvaert, M., Maes, B., & Onghena, P. (2011). Mixed methods research synthesis: Definition, framework, and potential. Quality & Quantity, 47(2), 659-676.
Hyde-Clarke, N. (2008). Beyond stereotypes: representations of a foreign culture in film students’ productions. Literator, 29(2), 149-167.
Instituto Nacional de Estadística e Informática. (2015). Perú: Perfil de la pobreza por dominios geográficos 2004-2014. Retrived from: https://www.inei.gob.pe/media/MenuRecursivo/publicaciones_digitales/Est/Lib1306/libro.pdf
IOP-PUCP (abril, 2018). Boletín N°151 Estado de la Opinión Pública: Experiencias de discriminación étnico-cultural en el Perú. Retrieved from http://repositorio.pucp.edu.pe/index/handle/123456789/123821
Ishibashi, J. (2003). Hacia una apertura del debate sobre el racismo en Venezuela: exclusión e inclusión estereotipada de personas negras en los medios de comunicación. In D. Mato (Ed.), Políticas de identidades y diferencias sociales en tiempos de globalización (pp. 33-61). Caracas: FACES-UCV.
Jost, J. T., & Banaji, M. R. (1994). The role of stereotyping in system-justification and the production of false consciousness. British Journal of Social Psychology, 33, 1-27
Kervyn, N., Yzerbyt, V., & Judd, C. (2010). Compensation between warmth and competence: Antecedents and consequences of a negative relation between the two fundamental dimensions of social perception. European Review of Social Psychology, 21, 155-187. doi: 10.1080/13546805.2010.517997
Latinobarómetro. (2011). Informe 2011. Retrieved from http://www.slideshare.net/FUSADESORG/informe-latinobarometro-2011
León, R. (1998). Humillados y ofendidos: un estudio acerca del desprecio y discriminación en el Perú. Revista de Psicología, 16(1), 45-81.
Montero, M. (1991). Una orientación para la Psicología Política en América Latina. Psicología Política, 3, 27-43.
Pancorbo, G., Espinosa, A. & Cueto, R. M. (2011). Representaciones estereotípicas y expresión del prejuicio en el Perú: la mirada desde la pobreza. Revista de Psicología, 29(2), 311-342.
Portocarrero, G. (2006, setiembre). Hacia una comprensión del racismo. Página de Gonzalo Portocarrero. Retrieved from http://gonzaloportocarrero.blogsome.com/2006/09/27/hacia-una-comprension-del-racismo/
Portocarrero, G. (1992). Del racismo al mestizaje: una apuesta por la integración . In G. Portocarrero (Ed.), Los quinientos años: un espacio para la reflexión (pp. 31-41). Lima: Allpamérica.
Reding, S. (2007). Diversidad y Racismo en América Latina. Latinoamérica. Revista de Estudios Latinoamericanos, 44, 157-179.
Schaller, M. & Crandall, C. S. (2004). The psychological foundations of culture. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Song Hing, L.S., Bodocel, D.R., Zanna, M.P., Garcia, D.M., Gee, S.S., & Orazietti, K. (2011). The Merit of Meritocracy. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101(3), 433-450. doi: 10.1037/a0024618
Stangor, C. (2009). The study of stereotyping, prejudice and discrimination within social psychology: A quick history of theory and research In T. D. Nelson (Ed.), Handbook of Prejudice, Stereotyping and Discrimination (pp. 1-22). New York: Psychology Press.
Tajfel, H. (1969). Cognitive aspects of prejudice. Journal of Social Issues, 25, 79-97.
Tajfel, H. & Forgas, J. P. (1981). Social categorization: Cognition, values, and groups. In J. P. Forgas (Ed.), Social Cognition: Perspectives on Everyday understanding (pp. 113-140). London: Academic Press.
Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In W. G. Austin & S. Worchel (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 33-48). Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.
Tajfel, H. & Turner, J. C. (1986). The Social Identity Theory of Intergroup Behavior. In S. Worchel & G. Austin (Eds.), Psychology of intergroup relations (Rev.Vol. 2), (pp. 7- 24), Chicago: Nelson-Hall.
Traverso-Yépez, M. (2005). Discursos Racistas: Institucionalización del Racismo a través de las prácticas lingüísticas. Revista Interamericana de Psicología, 39, 61-70.
Turner, J. C., Brown, R. J., & Tajfel, H. (1979). Social comparison and group interest in ingroup favouritism. European Journal of Social Psychology, 9, 187-204.
Twanama, W. (1992). Cholear en Lima. Márgenes, 9, 207-240.
Van der Toorn, J., Feinberg, M., Jost, J. T., Kay, A. C., Tyler, T. R., Willer, R., & Wilmuth, C. (2015). A sense of powerlessness fosters system justification: Implications for the legitimation of authority, hierarchy, and government. Political Psychology, 36(1), 93-110.
Van Dijk, T. A. (2007). Racismo y discurso en América Latina: una introducción. In T. A. Van Dijk (Ed.). Racismo y discurso en América Latina (pp. 21-34). Barcelona: Gedisa.
Vargas Llosa, M. & Munné, A. (2004). Obras Completas VI: Ensayos literarios I. Barcelona: Galaxia Gutenberg.
Yzerbyt, V., & Cambon, L. (submitted). The dynamics of compensation: When does ingroup favoritism permit complimenting the outgroup?
Volpato, C., Andrighetto, L., & Baldissarri, C. (2017). Perceptions of low status workers and the maintenance of the social class status quo. Journal of Social Issues, 73(1), 192-210.
Yzerbyt, V. (2016). Intergroup stereotyping. Current Opinion in Psychology, 11, 90-95.
Yzerbyt, V. (2018). The dimensional compensation model: Reality and strategic constraints on warmth and competence in intergroup perceptions. In A. Abele & B. Wojciszke (Eds.), Agency and Communion in Social Psychology (pp. 126-141). London, UK:
Routledge.
Yzerbyt, V. Y., & Cambon, L. (2017). The dynamics of compensation: When ingroup favoritism paves the way for outgroup praise. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 43, 587-600. doi:10.1177/0146167216689066
Yzerbyt, V., Provost, V., & Corneille, O. (2005). Not Competent but Warm… Really? Compensatory Stereotypes in the French-speaking World. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 8(3), 291-308.
Zárate, M. (2009). Racism in the 21st Century. In T. Nelson (Ed.) Handbook of Prejudice, Stereotyping and Discrimination (pp. 387-406). New York: Psychology Press.
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright: In the event that the manuscript is approved for future publication, the authors retain the copyright and assign to the journal the rights to publish, edit, reproduce, distribute, exhibit, and communicate nationally and internationally in the various databases, repositories and portals.
Self-archiving policy: The author can share, disseminate, and publicize his research published by the media (e.g., academic social networks, repositories, and portals) available on the web. During the editorial review process, the journal will provide the author with the previous versions (post-print) which should NOT be disclosed by any media, only for personal use and for final approval. Liberabit will send the author the final version of the article (published version) in PDF and HTML to be shared, disseminated and disclosed by the media available on the web. After the publication of the articles, the authors can make other independent or additional agreements for the non-exclusive dissemination of the version of the article published in this journal (publication in books or institutional repositories), provided that it is indicated with the respective reference that the work has been published for the first time in this journal.